Research Methodology of Takhrij Hadith

Authors

  • Annisa Mawaddah Program Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
  • Sardianto Program Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
  • Rahman Program Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61166/taqriri.v1i2.10

Keywords:

Takhrij Hadith, Sanad Criticism, Matan Criticism, Hadith Methodology, Hadith Validity.

Abstract

This study aims to answer the urgent need to assess the validity of the Prophet's hadith which is often used as the second source of Islamic law after the Qur'an. In scientific reality, many hadith are used without tracing the source, sanad, or assessing its quality. Therefore, this study is important to provide a systematic understanding of the takhrij hadith method. This article is categorized as a research article with a qualitative approach and uses a literature study of various primary and secondary sources, including books by Mahmud al-Tahhan and classical hadith scholars. This study reviews five main methods of takhrij hadith, namely based on the initial wording of the hadith, keywords of the matan, the first narrator, the theme of the hadith, and based on the quality status of the hadith. The results of the study show that each method has its own relevance and function that can be selected according to the needs, linguistic abilities of the researcher, and the structure of the book used. Takhrij hadith is proven to be not only a technical process of tracing, but is a methodological approach that requires precision, the ability to analyze sanad-matan, and mastery of hadith books. The conclusion of this study confirms that mastery of takhrij science is essential in maintaining the authenticity of Islamic teaching sources, especially in the academic and fatwa context. In the future, the development of a digital takhrij system and the integration of technology-based hadith indexes are very potential directions to facilitate this process on a global scale.

References

A La dan Suhaimi Affan, (2023), “Takhrij Hadits Dengan Metode Ar-Rawi Al-,” Jurnal Ilmiah Hadis 5, no. 1.

A. La dan Suhaimi Affan. “Takhrij Hadits dengan Metode Ar-Rawi.” Halaman 61–69.

A.J. Wensinck, (1936), Miftah Kunuz as-Sunnah (Leiden: Brill).

Abdul Majid Khon,( 2008) Ulumul Hadis (Jakarta: Amzah,)

Abū ‘Abdillāh Muḥammad bin Ismā‘īl al-Bukhārī, (1987), Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, bab 28, hadis no. 2472, hal. 664–665, cet. 1, Beirut: Dār Ibn Kathīr.

Abu Hajar Zaghlul, (2003), Mawsūʿat Aṭrāf al-Ḥadīth al-Nabawī al-Sharīf. Kairo: Maktabah al-Kulliyyat al-Azhariyyah.

Ahmad Farid, (2018), Metodologi Penelitian Hadis (Jakarta: Kencana)

Ahmad Syakir, (1995), Athraf wa Atharuhu fi Ulum al-Hadith (Kairo: Dar al-Nahdah al-Misriyah.

Al-Manawi, Ahmad bin Muhammad, (1995), al-Jāmi‘ al-Azhar min Hadith an-Nabi al-Anwar. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.

Arifuddin Ahmad, (2004), Paradigma Baru Memahami Hadis Nabi, Ciputat: Pustaka Al-Kautsar.

Ditinjau dari Segi Sanad dan Matan. “Metode Pentarjihan Hadits.” Jurnal 2012.1 (2012): 16–50.

Hasbi Ash-Shiddieqy, (1967), Pokok-Pokok Ilmu Dirayah Hadis (Jakarta: Bulan Bintang).

Hasbi Ash-Shiddieqy, (1967), Pokok-pokok Ilmu Dirayah Hadis. (Jakarta: Bulan Bintang).

Jalaluddin al-Suyuthi, (1990), al-Jami‘ al-Saghir min Hadith al-Bashir al-Nazir. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.

Jalaluddin al-Suyuthi, (2001) al-Jami‘ al-Kabir fi al-Hadith. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

M. Amin Abdullah,(2007), Ilmu Hadis: Sejarah, Metode, dan Pengembangan, (Yogyakarta: LKiS)

Mahmud al-Tahhan, (1978), Ushul al-Takhrij wa Dirasat al-Asanid (Riyadh: Maktabah al-Ma’arif)

Mahmūd al-Thahhān, (2005), al-Takhrīj wa al-Tanqīḥ fī al-‘Ulūm al-Ḥadīthiyyah (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah)

Muhammad A. Syarif, (2018), Metode Penelitian Hadis dan Aplikasinya, (Jakarta: Prenadamedia).

Muhammad Ajjaj Al-Khatib, (1975), Al-Sunnah Qabla al Tadwin. (Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah)

Muhammad Fuad ‘Abd al-Baqi, (1988), Muqaddimah fi Kutub al-Sittah wa Kutub al-Tis’ah (Kairo: Maktabah al-Qahirah).

Muhammad Fuad Abd al-Baqi, (1985), Mu‘jam al-Mufahras li Alfaz al-Hadith al-Nabawi, (Cairo: Maktabah al-Qahirah)

Muḥammad ibn ‘Īsā ibn Saurah al-Tirmiżī, Sunan al-Tirmiżī, jilid 4, bab 38, hadis no. 1958, hal. 341.

Muḥammad ibn Ismā‘īl al-Bukhārī, Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, bab 5, hadis no. 5789, hal. 1598.

Muhammad Qomarullah, ‘Metode Takhrij Hadits Dalam Menakar Hadits Nabi Oleh: Dosen STAI Bumi Silampari Lubuklinggau’.

Muhammad Yusuf, (2020), Takhrij Hadis: Prinsip dan Teknik (Yogyakarta: LKiS,

Muhammad Zuhri Hasan, (2019) Metode dan Teknik Penelitian Hadis (Jakarta: Kencana).

Mustafa al-Siba’i, (1998), Usul al-Hadits, (Damaskus: Dar al-Qalam).

Nurul Haq, (2017), Sejarah dan Metode Takhrij Hadis (Yogyakarta: LKiS, 2017).

Nurul Huda, (2020), Teknik Takhrij Hadis: Teori dan Praktik, (Malang: UIN Malang Press).

Reza Pahlevi Dalimunthe dkk.(2021), “Studi Takhrij Hadis Menggunakan Metode Tashih, Muqoronah, Tahlil, Tarjih, Dan Takhkim (Tmt3) Terhadap Hadis Tentang Penyebaran Covid-19, Jurnal Studi Hadis Nusantara 3, no. 1.

Syaikh Muhammad al-Madani, (1300 H), al-Ittihafat as-Saniyah fi al-Ahadis al-Qudsiyah (Kairo: Maktabah al-Khanji)

Syuhudi Ismail, (1992), Metodologi Penelitian Hadis Nabi (Jakarta: Bulan Bintang).

Syuhudi Ismail, (1992), Metodologi Penelitian Hadis Nabi (Jakarta: PT Bulan Bintang).

Wensinck, A.J, (1990), Al-Mu’jam al-Mufahras li Alfaz al-Hadith an-Nabawi, terjemahan Muhammad Fuad ‘Abd al-Baqi. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-24

How to Cite

Annisa Mawaddah, Sardianto, & Rahman. (2025). Research Methodology of Takhrij Hadith. Taqriri: Journal of Al-Hadith Science Studies, 1(2), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.61166/taqriri.v1i2.10

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.